Reliability of carbon dating

For instance, remnants of organic matter formerly held up as solid evidence of the most recent, large-scale global warming event some 40,000 years ago may actually date back far earlier to a previous ice age."The radiocarbon dating technique may significantly underestimate the age of sediment for samples older than 30,000 years,” said the authors of the report from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Germany’s Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics.This assumption is backed by numerous scientific studies and is relatively sound.

What do rock layers on the Earth's crust tell us about our origins and the age of the earth?

A rock sample from Nigeria was dated at 95 million years by the potassium-argon method, 750 million years by the uranium-helium method, and less than 30 million years by the fission-track method.

If the clock is not set to zero when a deposit forms, then there can be no starting point from which to calculate the age of a deposit.

Specimens would then look much older than they actually are.

d) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without knowledge of the exact ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14in the initial sample, the dating technique is subject to question.

Leave a Reply